Alys Beach

Alys Beach is a private beach and vacation spot in Florida, adjacent to Rosemary Beach. Rosemary is planted all along the walkways of Alys Beach.
The home owners of Alys Beach rent their houses to anyone in need of a peaceful getaway.

Virtual tour: http://www.alysbeach.com/our-town/alys-beach-video/

Map: http://www.alysbeach.com/our-town/town-map/#.UovasuLO_To

Sustainability: http://www.alysbeach.com/our-town/sustainability/#.UovgauLO_To
 
The Entrance to the private beach:
A courtyard with a fire pit surrounded by the houses of Alys Beach:Caliza is a restaurant and bar next to the Alys pool. surrounding the pool are cabanas, sun beds, lounging chairs, baby pool, reading pool, restrooms, hot tub, and hammocks. One of the beautiful houses of Alys Beach:A review

Sitting on King Quad

King Quad seems to be the center of most of the action on campus. This is where “The Rock” that all of the sororities paint is located, as well as, King House (the historical and supposedly haunted mansion), the sidewalks made of old red brick, the backside of the hand statue, and the view of three of the most active buildings on campus: Carmichael Library, Palmer auditorium, and Main dormitory. This scene seems to display many of the characteristics of the University of Montevallo, especially the valuing of history and scholarship.

Sitting at the bench on King Quad, looking straight ahead there is a large rock. This rock is spray painted by the different sororities at different times. They usually spray paint their colors, Greek letters and mascot on the rock. Right now, the rock displays Delta Gamma’s letters, colors and mascot. The side of the rock facing me has been spray-painted pink and blue with the Greek letters DG overlapping the colors. The words “Dee Gee” along with an anchor are plastered across the top of the rock. The excessive symbols, colors and letters of the sorority that have been marked on this rock signify the territoriality of the sororities and the need to either be, or at least seem to be, the dominant presence on campus.

Not only has the rock been sprayed with the sorority’s letters, but it has also been painted with all of the other symbols associated with the sorority such as the colors, the anchor, and the way the sorority’s Greek letters are pronounced. All people walking past this rock are presented with all of the information associated with this organization. This also conveys to the passersby that this is seemingly the most dominant presence on campus because this is the only sorority they see on this rock. The excessive symbols also signify the marking of the sorority’s territory. Because this rock is in an active area of campus and surrounded by some of the most used buildings, they are claiming their territory and making their presence known so most of the student body will see this message. In a way, the sorority is trying to trick the general public into believing they are either the most dominant presence on campus, or the only sorority on campus, since no other sororities’ letters or symbols are seen on the rock.

The rock is behind the hand statue – formally called ‘Becoming’. It is a landmark and popular meeting place on campus. This statue shows two hands reaching upward, one hand behind the other. The hand in front holds a set of keys. The hand in back is supposedly guiding the front hand. This sculpture signifies the professor guiding the students and passing along they keys of knowledge. This large statue, placed in a high traffic part of campus, shows the artistic side of the university. Art is incorporated into every aspect of campus life. An example of this is the painting of the rock, the ‘Becoming’ statue and College Night.

Past the ‘Becoming’ statue, one can see the Main dormitory, the oldest woman’s dormitory on campus. This building signifies the importance of the preservation of history to this university. Instead of tearing this building down and replacing it with another newer and nicer facility, the decision has been made to keep this building and use it as well even though it is beginning to show its age inside and out. For example, many people complain about the creakiness of the building and sometimes the occupants have to wrestle with a door, or a window before it opens or closes- some say this shows the university’s unwillingness to alter this historical building, even when it affects its residents. The front steps are beginning to crumble, and the outside of the building is beginning to show it’s age. Nonetheless, the sentimental value of these buildings outweighs practicality. Although many complain about the occasional difficulties of this building, no one would ever ask to make alterations and risk the possibility of changing this historical monument.

This same idea exists with the King House; it has been preserved and maintained to keep up its original appearance although it is not used regularly anymore. It seems it has no real use anymore, other than to attract people by way of it’s history. It was the first house in Alabama to have glass windows installed. Having a house on campus that is this old is a unique quality that not many other campuses can say they have as well. It is safe to say this house will not be demolished. It signifies the campus’ need to maintain the idea that it is proud of its history, and achieve individuality by doing this. It is on display in the center of an active part of campus, in the middle of many walk ways leading to different buildings.

The walkways are made of brick original to this campus. Again, Montevallo is showing the pride of having the uniqueness of the rich history. This pride overshadows the practicality of a smooth road. Many people complain of the difficulty of walking on campus because the bricks are so uneven and crumbled that they often trip, fall or scuff their shoes. Also, this same frustration is shared by drivers. Cars must drive cautiously across campus, not only because of pedestrians, but also because the uneven bricks rock the cars to and fro as they drive. But nonetheless, the bricks remain because not many other universities can say they have walkways of the original bricks used. This pride overshadows practicality and the function of the walkways as well as Main and King House.

Another building viewable at the bench on King Quad is Palmer auditorium. It signifies the oldest and most famous tradition on campus: the tradition of College Night. Montevallo and its students hold extensive amounts of pride for this tradition because it is such an important part of the college experience at this university. A bond is felt among all who attend Montevallo because they share and become a part of the uniqueness that is College Night, a uniqueness showcased when any visitor or newcomer arrives at the university. This building signifies the importance of tradition in Montevallo, and how engrained in the experience it is on campus. It shows the pride in the individuality of the traditions that sets this school apart from other campuses.

The Carmichael Library is also viewable from King Quad. The building is right behind Palmer auditorium and faces King House. This is probably one of the most active buildings on campus. Students come here for tutoring, researching, studying, learning, group meetings, escape, refuge, to finish homework, and the list continues. The location signifies the intention of the university. Placing Carmichael Library in a part of the campus that is frequented by many students daily, in order to draw in more students, shows the importance of studying and acquiring knowledge at the University of Montevallo.

The importance of history and scholarship is seen in the buildings and other symbols on King Quad. The rock signifies the opportunities a sorority has to persuade the students that it is the most dominant organization on campus. The ‘Becoming’ statue and Carmichael Library both seem to signify the importance of knowledge in the university. The red brick sidewalks, Main dormitory and King House all seem to signify the importance of uniqueness and sentimentality in history, even if this means impracticality. 

Have We Evolved as Much as We Believe?

When thinking of a campfire, one automatically thinks of ‘story time.’ This dates back to the cavemen. Karen Armstrong says in A Short History of Myth, when the Neanderthal “became conscious of their mortality, they created some sort of counter-narrative that enabled them to come to terms with it” (1). Barthes says in Mythologies that a myth is a form of communication that sends a message (215). The message conveyed in these story time gatherings is that of the common language of the inescapable eventuality of death. All races and ages know this language. I will be exploring the oral horror stories shared by the Neanderthals and how a form of this still exists within society today. There is a need for humans to be aware of their mortality and contemplate it, which is why, even today we surround ourselves with these horror stories in movies, TV shows, literature, websites, and especially when sitting around a fire.

According to Armstrong in her book A Short History of Myth, she states that an assumption can be made that the Neanderthal created myths and a belief in the afterlife based on trinkets and treasures found in the tombs of these people. Because the Neanderthal created these elaborate myths, they were well aware of their own mortality, and by attempting to escape it, they became more aware of their capability to die by creating these stories. But I propose that they told grand, elaborate stories of immortal beings, but they also told horror stories of mortal beings in frightening situations. Both of these helped humans cope with their mortality. This was shared by everyone because if nothing else, we all share the eventuality of death.

Ghost stories are told as a way for people to question what might come after death. People create these stories of beings that have passed and have returned to earth for one reason or another. This helps the people cope with the uncertainty after death, and offers an explanation. “We also want to know where we are going, so we have devised stories that speak of a posthumous existence” (6) says Karen Armstrong.

When we compare ourselves to the Neanderthals, we believe we have evolved, and in some ways we have. But, we have not evolved as much as we believe; we have only simply changed forms by which we convey our meanings and messages. This need to be aware of our own mortality is still very much alive in almost every aspect of our culture. It has merely transformed into other forms rather than just the one form of gathering around and orally sharing stories. An example of this change of form is as follows: based on evidence found in the tombs of the Neanderthal that Armstrong speaks of in her book, it seems likely that in ancient times, men and women would gather around, possibly sometimes in the night hours and share horror stories in order to remind each other of our mortality. But now we have changed the form from oral stories to films, TV shows, literature, even websites (http://www.hypnogoria.com/).  But through these forms, we still accomplish the same goals as our ancestors did around a fire: reminding us of our mortality.

This same idea is still with us today. People have the insatiable need to be scared, to be reminded of their own mortality and the meaning of humanity. There are countless movies in which there are terrible deaths. Some people wonder why we watch films and TV shows about gruesome deaths. I believe one explanation is to show the many different possibilities of death. I watched a movie about a group of mountain climbers recently. The climbers became lost within a cave and while trying to find a way out of the cave, each person was killed by realistic, yet unfortunate causes, such as slipping and falling down into a seemingly endless black hole within the cave. This is a terrifying possibility. And because it is a possibility, it reminds the audience of a scenario of death, one that we all will encounter eventually. When speaking on the creation of stories, Karen Armstrong says “it is nearly always rooted in experience of death and the fear of extinction” (3). The experience of death is explored through these ‘campfire stories’ by way of the creation of different possibilities of death. There is a commonality between these modern films and the Neanderthals; Karen Armstrong says “these stories proved to be so crucial to the way that human beings understood themselves and their predicament” (12).

One possibility as to why the campfire indicates story time which in turn signifies the human’s need to be reminded of mortality is the use of metaphor. Life is something known and sure; therefore it is symbolized by the light from the fire, as all things the light touches are seen. But the darkness is death, something unknown and impenetrable. Based on what was found in the tombs of the Neanderthal, one can imagine men and women sitting around a fire at night as they share horror stories of unknown creatures, evil and death, all the while not knowing what is lurking behind their backs in the shadows. One can imagine the fear they must have felt, the light from the fire only expanded over so much ground before the darkness took back its territory. When discussing something as terrifying and unpredictable as death, it seems fitting that the scene should parallel the ambiguity of mortality within the metaphor. 

Lady Gaga's "Telephone" - Annotated Images

The link to Lady Gaga's music video "Telephone" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVBsypHzF3U

I have used Prezi as a way to present my annotated pictures:
http://prezi.com/xuurkcjqmmr-/lady-gagas-telephone-restaurant/#

http://prezi.com/w5pyer7f9no9/lady-gagas-telephone-prison/

The pictures used (links to pictures and the websites):



http://abcnews.go.com/images/Entertainment/abc_gaga9_100315_main.jpg
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/SpringConcert/decoding-lady-gagas-telephone-video/story?id=10114081
http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/10800000/Lady-Gaga-Beyonce-Telephone-Music-Video-lady-gaga-10862085-1280-720.jpg
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/lady-gaga/images/10862085/title/lady-gaga-beyonce-telephone-music-video-screencap

During my first year at Montevallo I took a Composition 101 class.  In one of the classes the professor had us watch Lady Gaga's "Telephone" and observe it. We had to write down anything and everything we found interesting in the video. By the time the video had ended, I had filled a page entirely. I was so enthralled by all of the symbols and hidden meanings, but had no tools to understand what I was seeing or why I felt a certain way about it. I have revisited this video now that I feel I have acquired more tools to better understand at least some of the layers of meaning in this video.

Link to my previous blog for Sylvia Plath's "Lady Lazarus"

http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15292

The Metaphorical Analysis of Sylvia Plath's "Lady Lazarus"

During my reading of Sylvia Plath’s “Lady Lazarus” I discovered three metaphors I found particularly interesting. These intriguing metaphors are in the seventh and eighth stanzas where she compares herself to a cat, thirteen and fourteenth stanzas where she compares herself to a shut seashell, and then compares worms to pearls, and in the final stanza of the poem, stanza twenty eight, where she compares the men she eats to air.

In the end of the seventh stanza and the beginning of the eighth stanza Plath writes, “And like the cat I have nine times to die./This is Number Three” (Plath, poets.org). These two lines have a threatening tone. It seems as if she is stating her inability to die as if to state her immovability from the physical world. Why choose the cat as a comparison? The cat can be seen as a threatening and cunning creature because of its incapability to easily die, but the cat can also be a sexual image. By viewing the cat in the metaphor as a sexual image, it would seem that she is objectifying herself, just as the “crowd/Shoves in to see/Them unwrap me hand and foot--/The big strip tease” (Plath, poets.org). Because of her use of the phrase “strip tease” it is assumed by the reader that she is being objectified. It seems that there is an underlying threatening tone in the poem, that I believe, she fully expresses in the last stanza of “Lady Lazarus.” However, it seems that by comparing herself to a cat, a sexual image, she is objectifying herself. Later in the poem she speaks of a charge for eyeing her scars, hearing of her heart and attaining a part or piece of her body. She openly objectifies herself by saying she is something to be owned and experienced. She self-inflicts objectification onto herself. This idea can also be linked to the idea of her self-inflicted suicide attempt later in this poem.

In the thirteenth and fourteenth stanza, Plath writes, “the second time I meant/to last it out and not come back at all./I rocked shut/As a seashell./They had to call and call/And pick the worms off me like sticky pearls” (Plath, poets.org). Sea shells are extremely fragile, and difficult to open without harming the condition of the shell. When reading the lines surrounding this metaphor it becomes clear to me that she compares herself to a seashell as a way to express the fragility of her emotional ability to keep herself alive. This comparison of Plath to a seashell also conveys her need to shut herself off from the physical and emotional world, just as a sea shell shuts itself off from the world; she detaches herself from the entire Outside. The idea of Plath’s desire for the end of her life is especially strong in the lines “Dying/Is an art, like everything else,/I do it exceptionally well” (Plath, poets.org). This idea of Plath’s yearning for death can be inferred by her use of words; connotations and images are conjured by the audience upon reading this poem.

            Later in these same two stanzas, Plath compares the worms “they” had to pick off of her to pearls. This metaphor, which is a continuation of her seashell metaphor, seemed to be an oxymoron. Worms are considered dirty and unappealing, whereas pearls are beautiful and highly desired. So why would worms be described as pearls, when there is seemingly nothing in common? I believe by her particular choice of the words in this metaphor she tries to glamorize the idea of self-inflicted death. Because of her obvious fascination with death and her personal history, I can assume she thought of death as a beautiful escape and thus attempted to express this as well as attempted to persuade her readers to adopt her view, which is why she chose such beautiful words and images to match in metaphor with the grotesque images associated with death.

Later in the poem, in stanza 28, the final stanza of the poem, she writes, “Out of the ash/I rise with my red hair/And I eat men like air” (Plath, poets.org). Throughout the poem she seems to be in a weak state, but in this last stanza, she seems to rise against the people who objectify her. She states in the last stanza, that she is fed by air. If the air is men, and the men are the people who objectify her, she is essentially saying that she feeds upon them. This is an extremely threatening idea, she persuades the audience to think, through the entire poem that she is weak and in the last stanza she reveals to her audience that she is the true strength, and is fed by and risen up by the people who believe they are breaking her down. By comparing the men who objectify her to air, she creates a new perception of them. Instead of her tormentors they are her food. She consumes them as if they are nothing, just as they had seen her as nothing more than an object, therefore taking away their power over her. But I believe her argument can be seen in another frame. It appears she is attempting to persuade the audience to see her perspective. This bird seems to be a continuation of the cat metaphor; neither of the animals die easily. She tries multiple times to end her life unsuccessfully, which is her reasoning behind her usage of the phoenix and the cat in her metaphors. She is tormented by the men who objectify her. They are like air because they feed the fire that consumes her. This consuming fire causes her death, but also her rebirth, thus she is unable to die when she attempts to take her life. The last stanza can either be seen as a reveal of the true identity of her argument where she is a threatening and cunning woman who fools and consumes the men who objectify her, or the last stanza can be seen as a further plea for final death. I personally prefer to believe the interpretation of her threatening strength that tricks the men into being consumed.

Video for Group Discussion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RUMpQqMuFc

The Hollow Men
T.S. Eliot

MISTAH KURTZ—HE DEAD.
A penny for the Old Guy

I

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats' feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

Those who have crossed
With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
Remember us—if at all—not as lost
Violent souls, but only
As the hollow men
The stuffed men.

II

Eyes I dare not meet in dreams
In death's dream kingdom
These do not appear:
There, the eyes are
Sunlight on a broken column
There, is a tree swinging
And voices are
In the wind's singing
More distant and more solemn
Than a fading star.

Let me be no nearer
In death's dream kingdom
Let me also wear
Such deliberate disguises
Rat's coat, crowskin, crossed staves
In a field
Behaving as the wind behaves
No nearer—

Not that final meeting
In the twilight kingdom

III

This is the dead land
This is cactus land
Here the stone images
Are raised, here they receive
The supplication of a dead man's hand
Under the twinkling of a fading star.

Is it like this
In death's other kingdom
Waking alone
At the hour when we are
Trembling with tenderness
Lips that would kiss
Form prayers to broken stone.

IV

The eyes are not here
There are no eyes here
In this valley of dying stars
In this hollow valley
This broken jaw of our lost kingdoms

In this last of meeting places
We grope together
And avoid speech
Gathered on this beach of the tumid river

Sightless, unless
The eyes reappear
As the perpetual star
Multifoliate rose
Of death's twilight kingdom
The hope only
Of empty men.

V

Here we go round the prickly pear
Prickly pear prickly pear
Here we go round the prickly pear
At five o'clock in the morning.
Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow
For Thine is the Kingdom
Between the conception
And the creation
Between the emotion
And the response
Falls the Shadow
Life is very long
Between the desire
And the spasm
Between the potency
And the existence
Between the essence
And the descent
Falls the Shadow
For Thine is the Kingdom
For Thine is
Life is
For Thine is the

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world endsNot with a bang but a whimper.

"Because I said so" : Parental Ethos

The phrase "Because I said so" is commonly used among parents. But what does it really mean? I've been in a store on several occasions where this situation has occurred: a child does something the parent does not like, the parent tells the child to stop, and when the child asks why the parent simply says, "Because I said so."

Why? Why do parents feel as though their word is final only because the words are being spoken by them? My idea is that parents feel entitled to this Ethos. But should it ever be questioned? I think so.

I believe the parents should explain their reasons for reprimanding their children instead of defaulting to this pseudo-entitlement to Ethos, the consequences for not explaining one's self can be detrimental to the child's development.

A movie I watched recently about a woman in her early twenties being pestered by her over bearing mother is another example. When her mother would encroach on her daughter's personal life and attempt to tell her daughter to make certain decisions, her daughter would ask her why she was being so intrusive, her mother would only respond with the phrase, "Because I said so." Her mother felt the same sense of entitlement to Ethos that thousands of adults in parenthood also feel they posses. Although this is an exaggerated example of the Parental Ethos, this still holds true in every day life. 

Should parents feel this entitlement to Ethos? Should it be given and taken away at certain times or when the child reaches a certain age? Yes, I believe so.

Parental Ethos is an often abused tool. I believe it has its positive qualities such as when trying to impart certain morals and values within the child, to help them in the long term and future of their life- but even this can be disputed.

However, Parental Ethos also has a darker side. Parents often default to the phrase "Because I said so"- possibly out of laziness- and do not realize the consequences of this action. By simply telling the child those four words, the parents miss the multiple opportunities to teach the children an actual lesson and help them develop critical thinking, social skills, and the skills to help them determine right from wrong.

I believe this Parental Ethos should be...not completely disregarded, but diluted when the child begins growing older, this way the child can begin to form their own opinions and skills necessary for their all around wellness and quality of life. 

Parental Ethos must be something heavily monitored, it can easily be abused. This tool must not be underestimated- by the good influence but also the damage it can leave.

Rhetoric Response 1

KAIROS

This term has been played with constantly in different forms. In writings of love the importance of Kairos is detrimental to the outcome. In Sports, the ‘play’ depends on whether the ball is thrown and the catcher is available at the right time. In digital media, Kairos is left open for interpretation by the viewer.

Because the internet is so vast, something is constantly being seen or discovered. People are discovering new videos on Youtube every day. When I first came to college I was shown a video by someone who had just found it, and a year later someone else had recently discovered it and showed it to me again. Something as simple as a Youtube video can circulate and be found by anyone in the world within a matter of minutes, or years depending on the circumstances. These circumstances being: whether or not there is access to a computers or TVs, having friends who own computers or TVs.

I believe digital media has not canceled out Kairos, but prolonged it as a process. There are now two types of Kairos: Present Kairos and Past Kairos. An example: living in the late eighteen hundreds and attending a speech. This is present Kairos. In this situation, Kairos is very limited to this one time. No one outside of this occasion would know about the events of this speech. If the listener is not present, he/she misses the Kairos all-together. However, in present day terms, if someone were to attend a speech, this listener would be able to experience the speech, but because this speech is most likely being recorded and/or being reported on, the audience- or the people affected by this speech- is not only limited to the people in the room, but anyone and everyone connected to the internet.

http://www.ted.com/ is a great website for intellectual, academic, artistic and motivational speeches. This website is an exact example of Past Kairos. If the internet/digital media did not exist, these speeches given would never be seen by anyone else than those in that very room at that very time.

The internet has created Past Kairos. This way, no one is limited by time. Anyone can see any post in any website at any given time. A post made in the early 2000’s can still be seen by us in the present day, depending on the situation and opportunities that arise and fall in to place. There is more of a sense of inclusion in the world that the internet has opened; such as the events in the news, in ground breaking academic studies, and nonsensical entertainment internet videos and posts. These events happen all around the world at any given time, but because of digital media, the opportunities to view or be affected by these events does not conclude when the event ends. 

SYNECDOCHE

The general definition of Synecdoche is the use of referring to a part of something as a whole or vice versa. But to me, this definition is too surface. What does the use of this term actually mean, not just do?

In the internet, this kind of grouping happens regularly. From something as simple as a website page with different tabs; click on these tabs and you are given a variety of options to choose from that have been grouped under ‘Contact Us’ or ‘Membership’ or ‘Student.’ http://www.aiia.org/ is an example of this use of grouping. That particular website has grouped every possible link pertaining to the tab’s subject, into one list under the tab. Another example is with the categorizing of films. Romantic Comedies, Dramas, Horror, Thriller- these are all groupings of films being referred to as an entire genre.

I think there has also been a synecdoche of the people on the internet. Once people join the internet they are placed into that grouping and are thrown into the online world and thrown to the mercy of the internet and those that use it. There is a certain level of anonymity that is available through the internet, but because of this anonymity there have been a synecdoche of identity. Many faceless people are grouped into these categories and referred to as a whole, such as Anonymous- an internet group. http://thoughtcatalog.com/2011/the-different-types-of-people-there-are-on-the-internet/ This informal article is an example of that categorizing of people. I believe the internet has helped the connection of people across the world, but it has also hindered because people are suddenly able to hide their identity, throw caution to the wind and in some cases, lose sense of their humanity. I have been roaming through the internet and on several occasions come across a few disturbing posts made by faceless users. This idea of grouping people occurs every day in non-digital media settings as well, when someone sees another individual and places them into a category such as jock, nerd, meat head, weirdo, goth, and so on. Synecdoche creates the opportunity to simplify otherwise tedious actions such as a grouping on a website page, or in a film industry. But other than the categorizing of items, I believe synecdoche can be harmful to society. It becomes dangerous when this idea of synecdoche starts being used on people, especially in an internet setting where identity is already in question. 

First Blog.

Done.